Jim Mora Jr. Joins UCLA
Three of the four coaching openings in the Pac-12 have now been filled, with the announcement that UCLA has hired Jim Mora Jr. to replace Rick Neuheisel.
Mora, who was also in the running to replace Dennis Erickson at Arizona St., received a 5 year, $12 million deal from the Bruins, not to mention something less than love from some of the local media.
The biggest valid* reasons for reservations about Mora, 50, are his sub-.500 career coaching record, 32-34 in 3 years as head coach of the Atlanta Falcons and one at the helm of the Seattle Seahawks, and his lack of experience at the college level. Other than one year as a graduate assistant to Don James at Washington, his alma mater, all of Mora's other 21 years of coaching were as an assistant in the NFL.
Which can be significant, especially given the crucial element of recruiting at the college level has no real equivalent in the pro game, and Mora has described recruiting as a "necessary evil", not something he "enjoys".
And upgrading the talent level at UCLA is going to be an absolute necessity if lofty expectations in and around Westwood are going to be met in the face of the escalating level of competition in the Pac-12, after Arizona filled their opening by bringing in Rich Rodriguez, and Washington St. landed "pirate" Mike Leach, both of whom have the ability to roll out scoring machines that could eclipse even what Oregon has been able to do.
* delusional notions that UCLA actually could have attracted high profile coaches already employed at BCS-automatic qualifier and certain other top-10 programs and the idea that the Bruins are otherwise ready to make a run at the Rose Bowl every year are not grounds to dismiss a coach with Mora's experience.
The hire qualifies as a good one for UCLA on grounds other than the fact that no one else with any experience at a high level actually wanted the job.
Mora is a west-coast guy, and stayed in Seattle after being the odd-man out between the Mike Holmgren and Pete Carroll eras with the Seahawks. He's spent enough time in the area, not to mention being a candidate for the Washington job when Steve Sarkisian was hired, to have a better grasp of the situation at UCLA, as well as up and down the conference, than most folks in most of the country do. At the same time, he has seen things from the point of view from elsewhere. He can bring in fresh thinking without falling victim to not recognizing current local reality.
"As someone who has been around the game of football my entire life, I have always held the UCLA job in the highest esteem," Mora said. "Given its location and its tradition, UCLA is truly a sleeping giant, and I realize that an opportunity of this magnitude doesn't present itself more than once in a career, so I jumped at the chance to be a Bruin."
Despite a reputation for not being the most media savvy person, the reality is that he does have experience in the media, and he brings a host of experience at a whole different level, the NFL. Despite what many in the big business of NCAA football would like to believe, even in the LA market, the NFL is on a whole different level, and every local detail is a national story. Mora will do just fine with the size of the stage.
In order to compete in LA, against a USC program that despite scholarship limitations and the wishes of others across the conference, isn't going away, and across the conference, and the diversity of challenges it can pose, UCLA will need someone who can put a system in place, and that means putting a program in place that can put that system in place.
One of the key elements in Neuheisel's disappointing performance (getting the Bruins into the conference championship game and a bowl game with what he had to work with isn't exactly a failure, just not a resounding success) was his inability to get a staff together and get results from them, despite some high profile assistants like Norm Chow.
Mora will bring a renewed emphasis on defense, and a more stable approach to running the program. It probably won't produce a BCS bowl in his first year, which will doubtless further infuriate a frustrated Bruin N/nation, but it should make UCLA a tougher stop on the schedule in the long run.
The fact that he brings an approach and background significantly different than the other new hires so far, and the cultures of the existing programs in the conference, will force everyone else to "up their game", if for no other reason than a different set of variables will need to be considered.
And he won't be deluded into thinking inferior facilities and a lack of proper support from the University as a whole aren't that big of a problem, or be unable to communicate that message back to the administration.
Whether the rest of the institution and its community can deal with that reality will have far more to do with whether Mora succeeds of not than what he does on the practice field or on game day.
Andy_Wooldridge@yahoo.com
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mora must advocate for winning
Great recap of the positives and lastly stated elephant in the room.
We went for and got an outsider, hopefully that results in the Morgan Center stepping up. Shake up the status quo of insider communications
and a strong lack of consistency for U.C.L.A. football. Mora is the football man in Westwood and I think he can handle the pressure. Can he muster victories? Will he force the Block to remove harmful elements of our Athletic Departments leadership? Is he a smart enough coach to get what he needs and meet the expectations of Bruins? When will DG take a hike?
Go Bruins
by NicoBlue&Gold on Dec 11, 2011 6:14 PM PST via iPhone app reply actions
UCLA fans, 'delusional' or not, have every right to be pissed about this hire....
Bruin fans are angry their AD Dan Guerrero did not fire Neu after the team’s Arizona debacle (a blowout loss, fight at midfield, etc). Had Guerrero acted then, UCLA would have had first dibs on coaches. Instead, Guerrero waited until the regular season ended, then was pushed to fire Neuheisel before the Pac 12 Championship game. By then, Arizona had inked Rich Rod. Shortly after, WSU pulled the apparent coup of the college season in having the balls to hire Mike Leach.
Meanwhile Guerrero was busy planning his aquatic wine-tasting tour to Tuscony (hence the ‘Chianti Dan’ nickname) and promised, if Neu wasn’t going to be the coach, he’d find a suitable replacement.
As to the ‘delusional’ label; any Pacific Conference team can now afford to play in the big leagues as far as salary is concerned. Just look at WSU.
UCLA fans were dead set against retreads (Belotti) and unproven (Sumlin) and Guerrero made it clear he had decided Petersen @ Boise State was his man. When Petersen gave him the finger, Guerrero had no one else on his list.
Thus, UCLA is left with a guy who was a failure in the NFL and with next to no college experience.
High expectations are good expectations. If the fan base is happy with mediocrity, that’s all they deserve (and all they will receive).
Firing your coach first doesn't give you "first dibs"
You can ask someone to come work for you, but you can’t make them.
There’s more to this than just having the money in the bank to pay a salary, and the reality is many folks not in need of a job wouldn’t take the UCLA job.
Because Guerrero didn’t hire a number of other people who might have been a “better” selection doesn’t mean he didn’t ask, and receive the response “Thank you for calling, and thank you for the generous offer, but I’m not interested at this time.”
There would be no benefit to anyone in publicizing those conversations.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
uhhh
I (slightly) disagree. If the AD decided the weaz wasn’t going to be his coach, he should have moved sooner. Maybe you don’t have “first” dibs, but you do have time and more choices.
I’ve always thought UCLA could be a plum. They have a huge fan base, it’s LA (ok, westwood), and there are a couple of $‘s in the hiring kitty. I’ve seen the coaching carousel in hoops finally land on Howland, and maybe Mora is the guy but watching him in Seattle was pretty horrific stuff.
I don’t root against anybody but the ucks, so I hope Bruin Nation got their guy.
Go beavs.
Everyone seems to assume UCLA didn't talk to anyone until after they fired Neuheisel
There’s no reason to assume something like that.
Consider the situation at WSU. AD Bill Moos started considering possible replacements long before the end of the season, and then talked at greater length with Mike Leach once he decided that Leach would be a choice he would be happy with AND that Leach was interested. Wulff was still the coach, and remained so until Moos had an agreement with Leach. Only then did he release Wulff, since there was no reason to do so until he had a better option actually in place.
UCLA reached the point where letting Neuheisel hang in limbo no longer made sense, with the season over, but there’s nothing that prevented Guerrero from asking candidates he might be interested in if there was a mutual interest. Which in most cases, there wasn’t. But that doesn’t mean the question was never asked.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
Your use of facts and reasoning
are merely speed bumps on the road to me spouting my opinion. This be the internet, and I have caffeine.
by tradernum1 on Dec 13, 2011 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Of course firing your coach first does not give you 'first dibs'
Nowhere did I claim it did.
What was obvious from the get-go was that the AD of UCLA had not prepaired for the event of firing the football coach, even after the Arizona fiasco.
Consider the differences btwn Moos and Guerrero.
Moos did not know, in mid-November, that he was going to let Wulff go. But he knew it was a possibility. So he drew up a list of men who would likely be better coaches than Wulff. By all accounts, Leach was at the top of that list. Moos went to Florida on the sly to speak in person to Leach. He found Leach receptive. WSU then went on to finish the season and Moos had a decision: “Is WSU football conceivably better if I replace Wulff with Leach.” Moos decided: "Yes’’ and the deed was done.
Guerrero, on the other hand, had no plan in place, other than to go after Petersen. Is that because Guerrero had it on good authority that Petersen was interested in Westwood? By all accounts, No. Rather, Petersen was a good coach at a Western school not in the Pacific Conference and therefore Guerrero assumed Petersen would accept his offer. When Petersen turned down Guerrero, Dan was left grasping, apparently going so far as to cross his fingers and try to wrestle UW’s coach out of Seattle.
Maybe, after firing Rick, Guerrero indeed then made a phone call to Leach. But by then, a better AD had already formed a relationship with Leach.
Leach replaced a coach with a better coach.
Guerrero replaced a coach with a coach.
Guerrero’s track record at UCLA speaks for itself.
by ConfofChamps on Dec 13, 2011 4:32 PM PST up reply actions
I do suspect that Guerrero
is at least somewhat guilty of the same erroneous assumption that many UCLA alum, boosters, and other interested parties have fallen victim of, that UCLA is somehow one of the more attractive destination jobs out there, and that if they ask, most will gladly jump at the opportunity to come to them, regardless of their current situation.
The fact of the matter is they are far from what they think they are, never mind wish they were, when everything is considered.
I do agree that Moos did a far better job of covering a variety of contingencies, as well as a better job with his phone/leg work.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
Not a promising hire
Underqualified and overpaid. But people said that about Pete Carroll and Lane Kiffin at USC. The former was a big success, and the latter is doing well, too. Since it’s too late to undo Guerrero’s latest inexplicable decision, we Bruin fans will just have to hope for the best. I really don’t understand the Bruins Nation comments about canceling season tickets, withholding contributions to the university, etc. How can you punish and root against your school? Mora deserves a chance to build a staff, recruit players, and compete in the conference. I’m not going to give up on him before his team has even played a game.
People have gone batshit over Mora
…. but after two days on the job, he’s already assembled the foundational elements of a very promising staff and instituted some of the pillars of discipline that the UCLA team sorely needs (see his ban on team-related tweeting and facebook posting).
Looking at a cumulative .500 record in the NFL and saying that this is the definitive proof that he will fail as a college coach is both alarmist and absurd. Nothing is guaranteed, but to the people who know the game of football, JMJ is a highly respected and highly sought out personality. He’s the perfect alternative to CFB pretty boys like Chip Kelly, Lane Kiffin and Rich Rod who focus more on both themselves and their systems and less on the individuals.
I also find it interesting that there was exactly one man who was dying to go to Westwood, and he is the one man who the fans are revolting against. Nobody else wanted to be there.
I like the hire and I think he is going to be more than fine.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon
"assembled the foundational elements of a very promising staff"
At every level, this is the single most important thing a coach can and must do. Because one person can not handle the job at any level. There are simply to many issues to deal with.
It is also an under-appreciated skill, which is surprising given the amount of complaining we all see (and do) about the obvious problems that can be caused by an assistant coach or staffer that isn’t up to the job.
I think the exposure to and experience with what it takes to assemble and manage a staff, both on field and off, that goes into a successful NFL operation can be of great value in a coach. It appears that Mora grasps this, and its why I think he’s a good choice for the situation at UCLA.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
Mora's quickly assembling a solid-looking staff
Adrian Klemm (offensive line, formerly at SMU), Demetrice Martin (defensive backs, formerly at Washington) and Steve Broussard (running backs, formerly at Arizona State) have been confirmed, and the LA Daily news has reported two others: Noel Mazzone (offensive coordinator, formerly at Arizona State) and Marques Tuiasosopo (tight ends, formerly an intern at UCLA who is presently serving as QBs coach).
There’s NFL as well as college experience there.
If Mora can approximate that with his defensive hires, the Bruins could become real tough to deal with rather quickly.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
the thing that UCLA fans and other skeptics didn't give Mora credit for ....
…. was the depth of relationships that he had all over the football landscape. His tenure and experience in the game of football is a big advantage that he has over most coaches in the Pac 12 including Kelly, Sark, Kiffin … even Leach and Rich Rod.
He’s going to be fine.
Damn, my eyeball tastes good.
@chrislandon

by 



































