Pat Maynor = Human Trash.
UPDATES:
Interesting...Stanford only had 105 yards of offense in the 2nd half, about 30 of that on one running play. That makes the turnovers harder to stomach.
Thoughts on last night:
- Wow. It's been a long time since I've seen someone prove to the Earth that they are the biggest pussy on it. Good job Stanford douche bag, way to go, coward. Spearing Moevao after a handoff on a dive play left no doubt in the matter.
- It's just one game, but it's hard to stomach losing when the opposing team's leading tackler was their cornerback.
- Lyle Moevao had 400 yards passing and 3 TDs, what more can you ask for?
- Stanford had 6 giant misting fans on their sideline, OSU had 0. It was a hundred degrees. Stanford's bench is in the shade, OSU's in the sun. It was a hundred degrees. Can somebody explain this lack of giant misting fans to me when it's a hundred degrees? I know it's really not that big of a deal, but it's a big deal.
- SIGNIFICANT players left the game due to leg cramps on multiple occasions. I know that there's a chance that teams from the Northwest might not be as well-adjusted to high heat as teams from California or Arizona or other very hot places, but this is NCAA football, and we have a professional training staff. Get a salt tablet. Drink some Gatorade. Invest in some pickle juice. Practice with the heat on in the indoor facility during the summer. Get adjusted. I'm tired of seeing this every time we play in the heat.
- I can't decide if this game reminds me more of Stanford 1999, ASU 2001, or USC 2006--from USC's perspective?
- Could somebody tackle Gerhart? That guy is good. And big. But we have a guy just like him to practice against. So I don't get why we wouldn't be able to wrap up this guy. But, it doesn't make me feel better about the fact that there were only a handful of practices where full tackling of the ballcarrier was allowed.
- Speaking of good, big running backs....4 carries for Ryan McCants? I know they were loading the box, and I know that Lyle could not be stopped, and Shane Morales was MONEY, but I still don't get it.
- Speaking of things I don't get, The Flysweep--why only use it 5 times a game to keep a defense honest, when you could run it 10-12 times a game to drive a defense insane? James Rodgers is lethal.
- Jacquizz's 10 yard run was pretty awesome.
- The game wasn't lost in the 4th quarter. It was lost when OSU couldn't punch it in on the 8 minute drive to open the 3rd quarter. That would have done more to change the outcome of the game than anything else.
- Lyle looked GREAT. One bad pass--to the smartest safety in the conference perfectly executing a great defensive call--out of 54 attempts. 400 yards. 3 scores.
- More than 50 passing attempts? Seriously? Is that who we are? I don't think that's our offense.
- Not since they took down all of the Saddam Hussein posters in Iraq has there been someone as likely to be wherever you look as Bryant Cornell was last night.
- The defense got 2 sacks in only 17 passing attempts against a very good offensive line--that's a lot of disruption ...against the pass.
- Giving up only 90 yards through the air is a secondary that's doing their job ...against the pass.
- Victor Butler is completely UNBLOCKABLE.
- Keaton Kristick needs Al Afalava behind him so he can loosen up and take more risks.
- Stephen Paea was amazing. There was a play where about 2-3 Beavers ran the running back out of bounds, and he was one of them--getting there from the defensive tackle position is some serious hustle.
- I never really thought about it before, but giving possession to a team that doesn't actually recover a fumble is a pretty weird rule.
- It's right up there with whatever Leaping & Landing is.
- Last year's Pac-10 champion lost to Stanford, too.
- Down by 16 in the 4th quarter, and it was no big deal. The team was moving the ball and my comeback sense was tingling.
- Same thing in the 2-minute drill. ...why not run more of a hurry-up offense? Stanford probably doesn't have the depth to hang with that.
- Man, Lyle was poised out there.
- About 40% of Stanford's rushing yards came on 2 plays, 1 of them where the guy bounced off a group of guys who were swarming to the ball. It's hard to imagine that really happening too often in the future, but you never know.
- It's all correctable; this team will still be good this year.
- Look on the bright side, as hard as it is to believe, Pac-10 refs made the correct call on a goalline fumble.
- That Stanford guy is still a HUGE pussy.
Amazing.
0 recs |
22 comments
Comments
Which Stanford guy...
…are you referring to at the top (and bottom) of this post?
by sangdorange on
Aug 29, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Cheap Shot
That hit on Moevao was pretty cheap. I have a hard time believing he wasn’t deserving of being tossed. He should have been out of there immediately. With regards to Stanford, they aren’t a bad team and I hope this loss proved something. They are getting better every year and teams need to look out for them
With regards to OSU’s performance, I think you have a lot of positive to take away from this game. Your defense, by the end of the year, will be huge. Moevao had a pretty good game number wise but even Riley said after the game “this is not the team we want to be”.
All things that were bad are correctable and are not the result of lack of talent. Your O-line is a big concern but the playcalling is going to help that a lot. By the end of the year, you guys will be really solid and battle-tested. The outcome wasn’t want you wanted, but if I was a beaver fan, I would be really excited about this performance.
Oh, and as a Duck fan, my condolences on the way that game ended. Been there. If that game went another 5 minutes, that is a beaver win for sure.
Beat Penn State.
--Dominic
Autzen Stadium is where great teams go to die." - J. Brady McCullough, The Michigan Daily.
by dvieira on
Aug 29, 2008 4:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It was hard to take
Mostly because you can’t put the blame on anyone. Good play calling, good play on both sides of the ball, put up numbers. The only thing that we could have done better is force turnovers (we had 3, Stanford had 0). Its commonly known that turnovers is one of the only stats that almost directly correlates with wins and loses. We had 200 more yards of offense then they did, but a pick for a touchdown, a fumble out of the back of the end zone for a safety, and then the fumble at the end of the game for a touchback. 3 plays out of the entire game went wrong for us. This loss won’t look AS bad at the end of the year, I truly believe Stanford could be a 7 or 8 win team this year. But it is the reason you don’t start the season on the road in conference- you get these kinks knocked out before conference play starts. Bring on Penn State I guess. Go Beavs!
by The VD Special on
Aug 29, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No team who plays in a half-empty stadium an in-conference game on opening night with gorgeous weather deserves a single win.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Aug 29, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
PSU guy here
How do you guys think you will do next week against us? I am definitely worried about some of your offensive weapons, our secondary is a weak spot. Your D line looked tired against the run, they will probably look better at PSU in some nice 70 degree weather.
I don't know, Mello Yello is pretty awful. What's the worst that could happen?
by psu on
Aug 29, 2008 7:42 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I feel that...
It will be a good game. PSU has tons of injuries and our defense will be better than they were last week. They have more than a week to rest up and get ready. The real question is how is our team going to handle 110,000 people when we play in a stadium with less than 50,000? Cal was the more talented team 2 years ago when it played at Tennessee, but we all saw what happened. It’s the reason there is a home field advantage. But remember what we did when we played at LSU 5 years ago. I’m excited for the game.
Go Beavs!
by The VD Special on
Aug 30, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It will be a tie. Da Bears-s will win.
…most of their production was on 3 running plays. I’m disappointed in the missed tackles that created those big plays.
I don’t think we’ll fumble 5 times in consecutive weeks, but it’s happened before. You never know.
If the turnovers are even, OSU will win because of the advantages at the skill positions. If it’s a high scoring game, OSU will win for the same reasons…and most Big-10 teams just don’t match up very well in shootouts with Pac-10 teams.
BUT…if it’s low scoring, or if OSU loses in the turnover column…Penn State will win.
I don’t think that a large crowd will have a lot to do with the game—we made plenty of mistakes in front of a small crowd just 2 days ago! But, seriously, it’s not the crowd—it’s the team you play. Penn State is pretty good. Happy Valley, Death Valley, the Swamp, Husky Stadium, Autzen Stadium, Reser Stadium, the other Death Valley….those places aren’t homefield advantages when the home team is bad.
Also, just FYI, Wisconsin runs the Mike Riley offense, too. There’s a few years of diverging variations—I’m sure. We run the Flysweep, they don’t. There’s probably some other variations since Paul Chryst has taken the reigns in Madison a few years ago, but…96% of it is the same.
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dude
now you know how we feel for the cal game last year
GO DUCKS
HUCK THE FUSKIES
by Duck4Lif3 on
Aug 29, 2008 11:50 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
This post started out sounding pretty excuses, excuses, excuses
But your points did get better as it went on.
Let me be one of the many to say, fumbling into the endzone is the worst way to lose. As you know, we’ve been there too.
You may have not deserved to win this game, with the game you did play, but it’s still the toughest of breaks, that endzone fumble.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Aug 30, 2008 12:28 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
not excuses--just complaints.
The heat had nothing to do with fumbling 5 times. Giving away the rock was the culprit, and it was a team effort.
Another interesting thing is that Stanford only had 100 yards of offense in the 2nd half. Their offense wasn’t really doing anything, despite what our memories might say.
Now that I’ve gone back to the old boxscores, this game was almost exactly like the oregon-cal game last year, and kind of similar to the USC-OSU game in ’06.
An excuse would have been more like this:
“We didn’t lose, we just ran out of time.”
-Mike Bellotti after one of his many epic bowl failures
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Again, only part of the story...
…to suit your needs.
What you fail to mention (or perhaps just don’t know) is that quote was after the Sun Bowl back in 1999 (I believe that was it).
It was a tongue in cheek comment and Bellotti was actually quoting from the Great Vince Lombardi. It was Lombardi who originated the, “in my entire career, I never lost a single game…I just ran out of time”.
Bellotti actually went on to explain further about the lose (and the comment) and the comment wasn’t taken seriously.
Civil War Sports .::. www.CivilWarSports.com
by Pac10Rivalry on
Aug 30, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
just like there was more to the story when his son had a "digestive disorder"
yes, couldn’t process alcohol as fast as he could drive, apparently.
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
HA HA HAAA...
Yeah, you won’t hear me (or any sane person) argue how idiotic that SHIT was. lol
But hell, I’m sure you and me both have a “digestive disorder”!
It’s Football Saturday! Drink up!!!
Civil War Sports .::. www.CivilWarSports.com
by Pac10Rivalry on
Aug 30, 2008 11:13 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yawn....Bellotti has an extensive body of work.
“The better team didn’t win today.”
-Mike Bellotti, 2000 Civil War loser.
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You have a major problem of taking quotes out of context dude...
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Aug 30, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You don't need to apologize for the ENORMOUS, OVERWHELMING VOLUME of material to work with....
The context is the sheer volume of crap that he puts out.
How many jobs that he wasn’t ever offered did he publicly turn down?
What did he say before the BYU beatdown?
What were his comments afterwards?
What did he say before and during the summer about Dennis Dixon playing baseball?
What was his excuse for having one of his coaches FORGE a guardian signature on JJ Arrington’s illegal LOI?
It’s okay to say that they’re out of context, I suppose, but….the context is that he has a major problem with reality. I don’t have ‘a problem’ with taking quotes out of context, grellow fans just have a hard time seeing the forest for the trees.
When you add Bellotti and Joe Giansante’s combined little man’s syndrome together as the primary source of propaganda for over a decade, it’s no wonder that duck fans have a distorted, overinflated, myopian worldview that has nothing to do with reality.
Peace. Enjoy your ‘rivalry’ game with the last place huskies tonight.
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
"butthol" sorry...had to delete your comment...
Consider it an opportunity for you to learn your team’s history.
Google that (lawyers).
by CV3000 on
Aug 30, 2008 3:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ahahahahaha
Trying out your brand new iron fist huh?
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on
Sep 2, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I know why you lost. . .
It was the lack of giant misting fans as you listed in your fanpost. Those damn misting fans. In my opinion it’s a conspiracy by the PAC-10 to stack the odds against the Beavers. Oh well, There’s always next game. Oh wait, We’re playing Penn State. Nevermind.
Go Beavs!
by JBinO on
Sep 3, 2008 4:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs









