Oregon Scores 51 in Second Half, Overtakes Beavers
The Beavers won the first half, but the Ducks won the second half-- and the game-- Sunday night at McArthur Court.
The Beavers, who haven't won a game at Mac Court since the 1992-1993 season, seemed in prime position to do so until the Ducks took the lead for good with 11:47 remaining in the second half. Oregon took the lead as part of a 19-0 run over the course of five minutes in which the Beavers didn't score. Oregon went on to win the game by the score of 79-69.

"This definitely stings," Coach Robinson said after the game. "We haven't had a game where we played this poorly in one segement for a long time."
Oregon State falls to 7-9 in Pac-10 play with the loss, but has two more games next week before the Pac-10 tournament.
The Beavers played a brilliant first half, in which they shot 62.5 percent from the field, seemingly making back-cut after back-cut to quiet any kind of Oregon attack.
But the Ducks used the full court press to their advantage in the second half, getting the Beavers off balance for long enough to turn the momentum.
"That press bothered us," said Robinson. "We were way to casual. That's a function of having put a lot of games in the 'W' column-- there are quite a few lessons to be learned here."
The Beavers have come from behind to win games on multiple occasions this season, usually by riding their 1-3-1 defense. But Oregon State's usual defensive strength wasn't effective against the Ducks, as the Beavers seemed to play more man-to-man defense than zone, and more 2-3 zone than 1-3-1.
"I feel for Seth... he plays so hard," Robinson said. "He just had a dark cloud over him tonight. This was the first day we didn't get very much out of our 1-3-1. We just couldn't make up for it in other ways."
Calvin Haynes led the Beavers with 16 points, but his 5-for-16 shooting performance wasn't too impressive. He seemed to force it at times, but when the Beavers got down with a large amout of time remaining, I felt like it was Calvin that would get the Beavers back in the game. He made a couple big shots, but it wasn't enough.
Seth Tarver came through with 14 points offensively on a night when his defensive game lagged at times... he had some nice backdoor cuts and overall play around the rim. One steal in the game for Seth.
Roeland scored 13 in the game, most of them coming in the first half. Six assists, but three turnovers. He had a look at some big three-point shots, but couldn't get them to fall at the right time. He made two in the first half, though. But that air-ball... I might have nightmares about it.
Good effort from Lathen Wallace in just thirteen minutes... he hit two big threes towards the beginning of the game, and provided some firepower before Calvin Haynes even got in the game. He got into some fould trouble though, and finished with nine points.
Claitt makes that baseline inbounds play look so pretty, and his eight points seemed to all come at opportune times. Four of six shooting isn't bad, with four assists in 38 minutes.
All-in-all, it's not a game for the Beavers to hang their heads on. There's two more games next week, and they're not out of reach by any means.
Coach, after the game: "We might have come in to confident. Too cocky. That's what happens when you win games. It's a good lesson for us."
--Jake (jake.buildingthedam@gmail.com)
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
Good write up Jake, thanks!
The more I hear from and see how he coaches the more I like Coach Robinson. He’s really going to build up this program in the upcoming years.
I posted the below in the other thread but thought I would repost it here as my own summary and emphasize that I really do believe it too!
______________________________
I hope no one is getting too down about this game. Sure I wanted it and man it was rough watching it slip away like that. BUT let’s put this all in perspective. Were any of us even thinking about being in a game like this at MacCourt and expecting to win? I mean many of would have said we would have liked to make a game of it at the beginning of the season and not lose by 20 points!
Tough loss but come on we all knew the Ducks were better than their record and this Beaver team played really good at times tonight and really for the most part this season has been great! Look at those crowds we got for the Oregon and Cal games, did anyone expect to see and hear that in Gill?
PLUS this season is not over! The way we are playing we can still win in LA and yes we can still beat UCLA. Will it happen? Who knows, but also the way Oregon is playing they can beat one if not both teams too and if they can beat USC that bodes well for us. And we have the Pac-10 tournament.
I will be honest, and people may not like my feel good vibe after losing to our rivals, but if we lose out the remaining games this season I still would be excited about OSU basketball and be very proud of this team’s year this year. And you know I don’t think we will lose out.
-RVM
by rvm on Mar 1, 2009 10:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree
This one does sting but it should be fun to see how we do down the stretch. I can’t believe that our final two games aren’t on tv. I think I’m going to cough up the $9.95 on Saturday to watch our game online. It’s on Trojans All Acces. So does anybody think we still have a shot at postseason play? I think we’ll have an outside chance at the CBI, but we’ll have to split the LA schools, and get a couple of wins in the Pac-10 tourney. Anyway, I’m just glad we’re in the position to talk about postseason play.
Go Beavs!
by ConnorOSU on Mar 2, 2009 8:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not on TV? Either one? You're *beeping* me aren't you?
Man, I think that is making me feel as worse as losing last night. I was totally looking forward to watching them, especially want to see the last games for this group since it will be a very different team next year and been so fun (and so frustrating!) watching this group this year.
Postseason? I don’t know and I’m also curious but I’m thinking there is still an outside chance at the NIT, but I could be wrong. Beat both USC and UCLA and win a couple in the tournament (which will not be an easy task but could happen). That would put us at 9-9 for conference play and 15-14 for overall play (and does tournament play count in the record?). Hell, okay, I don’t know, this is all too new to me and the past many years of OSU basketball! Anyone have ideas?
-RVM
by rvm on Mar 2, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if FSN said it would be on...
…doesn’t mean ##$#$ Comcast will put the game on. I was really hoping to watch the game in HD, especially since FSN said it would be HD, the TiVO programming guide said it would be on Comcast’s HD Sports channel, which also airs OSN broadcasts. Come gametime, though? Nothing. Black screen. Had to watch the game in lousy, fuzzy standard def.
by sangdorange on Mar 2, 2009 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NIT
I agree we can we can make the NIT, but I wasn’t counting on us beating UCLA.
by ConnorOSU on Mar 2, 2009 6:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yep, not an easy task
but not impossible (which I thought it would be at one point)
-RVM
by rvm on Mar 2, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
CBI
I think the CBI is a more likely destination for the beavs.
by Harringtoncuz3 on Mar 2, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the NIT will need a hell of a showing from the Beavs so you are probably correct, but still hoping.
Just what is the CBI though?
-RVM
by rvm on Mar 2, 2009 8:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The College Basketball Invitational
It started last year.
by ConnorOSU on Mar 2, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So is it just another NIT? Or does it take teams lower than the normal NIT invites?
I know people have been talking about it for a little while now, but all the time I thought it sounded a bit strange. I mean the main dance tournament then the NIT then the CBI. Seems like a lot.
-RVM
by rvm on Mar 2, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a $50,000 buy-in tournament.
You don’t even have to be above .500 on the year. They pick after the NIT selections.
by sangdorange on Mar 3, 2009 2:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well
it is like the NIT but with slightly worse teams, and only 16 teams are invited
by Harringtoncuz3 on Mar 5, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 












