Okay now, PSU is a must win.
Here's the deal. Last year was a great year, all things considered. I've always been a little skeptical after Erickson left, and being a Beaver believer with season tickets through the 80's and 90's (when they were quite affordable and the term "Beaver Believer" hadn't been created yet, by the way), I was worried the Beavs would slump back into those unglorious days.
But Riley has proven me wrong the last two seasons. Last year, after the Cinci game, I was ready to hang my hat for the season. More so after 42 interceptions at ASU. So it is tempting to have the same doubts after losing to a Stanford team who is picked to do no better than any other California highschool. Sorry for that, Cards. I forgot. We lost.
While it can't really be said that last year's home game against Utah pumped us up for Cinci the following week, at least it was a home game to start the year. Provided we lost to Cinci, at least we could come back home the following week, and beat up on some college team from the nuclear testing grounds of south-central Idaho. However, I don't feel so hopeless this year. Yet.
I'm a believer, don't get me wrong. But I'm a realist as well, and we have the #2 toughest schedule of the Pac 10 teams. Following this game on a flight to Penn State ain't going to be easy. The Lions smell fresh blood, and we can't play there like we did in Cinci last year, and have any sort of prayer. (I'm assuming the N.Lions roll all over their opponent this weekend)
The Beavs want another 9 win season. And we can attain it. But PSU is a must win for that to happen. It's too bad that the Beavs are in such a crucial situation at the beginning of the season, but with the loss to the Cards, they are.
Now to a short analysis of the game this evening. I hate to say it, but I think much of this loss could have been avoided if one player was present. Afalava would have sealed up so many of those holes. I don't doubt it for a second. I don't know why he got suspended, and I don't care why. But I hope he learned his lesson, watched the game, and cringed knowing that he is crucial to the Beaver D. He'll be back next week, will make a presence, but there are other adjustments to the D that Riley will have to make in order to shut down PState.
While it would be great to have some all american stud at QB, I'll take LM. Jonathon Smith showed us what a little heart and good aim can do. I think LM played outstanding. One interception was first tipped. I can live with that. One was a bad mistake. One bad mistake throwing to the other team is a tenfold improvement over last year. And the receiving corp was incredible. Sammy is back, and Morales can't seem to drop anything. Keep that sort of show up, and we're looking good.
The only criticism I have on offense is this. We need a running back. We need that go to guy. That Jackson or Yvenson. Was Riley giving Quizz and McCants a see tonight? Do we have a #1 guy going in? Both are great. I would've just liked to have seen McCants get enough touches to get into a rhythm, to put a consistent game together.
But in the end it's the D that needs the work. Certainly they had some great series, and if they can tighten that up some more, we have a legit shot at going into Beaver Stadium and claiming it.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of SB Nation or the Building the Dam staff. FanPost opinions are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable Oregon State fans.
0 recs |
14 comments
Comments
I think you guys have a chance
If only because Big Ten defenses can struggle against faster Pac-10 offenses….
Proud member of Duck nation!
by skywaker9 on Sep 2, 2008 9:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Big Ten is really vulnerable to the no-huddle
But that’s one of the only advantages.
Your friendly neighborhood placekicker.
by qrsouther on Sep 2, 2008 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
It’s pretty much only Michigan under Carr.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com
by jtlight on Sep 2, 2008 9:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We saw how Ohio St
Couldn’t handle Florida, LSU or Illinois with the no huddle spread. Penn State is no different. But that is one of the only advantages…
by The VD Special on Sep 2, 2008 12:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Too bad OSU doesn't run the no huddle spread.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com
by jtlight on Sep 2, 2008 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe not no huddle
But did you see our passing the other night? Definitely appears to be moving towards a spread.
by The VD Special on Sep 2, 2008 12:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"Spread" is a very ambiguous term...
The no-huddle spread option based offense has given a lot of teams trouble, regardless of conference. But that’s not what OSU runs. Even if they spread the field, which everyone does this days, it is very doubtful that Penn State that this will be a problem for Penn State. The Big 10 has been running “spread” variations for some time (Northwestern, Purdue, and even Penn State a few years ago). It’s very doubtful that any offensive gameplan that OSU runs will give them any decisive advantage.
My main point is that you can’t say that Penn State is vulnerable to this or that because of what has happened in other games with other teams in previous years. This game will not be about Ohio State or Michigan or anyone else. It’ll be able how Oregon State matches up with Penn State.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com
by jtlight on Sep 2, 2008 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll agree
But Big 10 defenses are generally set up to beat Big 10 offenses, which traditionally have been run first, I-form, 2 back offenses, not pass happy. It has changed a little bit with Purdue and more recently Illinois. But you’re right, it has nothing to do with Michigan or Ohio State. I guess I worded it wrong, but my main point was that I believe Oregon State has the offensive firepower to put up points against Penn State, the main question is if our run defense improved enough in a week to be able to stop their rushing offense. Watching the Stanford game again, I’m just not sure. It appeared that we either stuffed the run, or gave up a big play. It should be a fun game to watch.
by The VD Special on Sep 2, 2008 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know the status of Perry?
Without him, it could be trouble. PSU has one of the best defensive lines in the nation. It is of the caliber that it can take over the game, and really neutralize an advantage of the receivers.
Also, if OSU can’t establish a run game, and the D-Line can just pin their ears back and go…that will spell trouble as well.
--www.AddictedToQuack.com
by jtlight on Sep 2, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I still think he's out
I think the staff wants him 100% before he gets out there. It might hurt OSU, but he could potentially have a solid NFL career, and knee injuries are the worst, especially for a giant like Perry. My guess is that they are protecting the best interests of Perry, not the team. And you’re right again, Penn State’s DLine is good, but it’s really hard to take anything away from their game v Coastal Carolina, other then they are bigger, faster and more talented and just ran it down their throats. Not taking anything away because they gained nearly 600 rushing yards, which is impressive no matter what, but I just don’t know. PSU is the Clemson of the Big 10, always over rated. But given OSU’s history of starting slow in non-conference games, it could be a long trip home.
by The VD Special on Sep 2, 2008 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michigan is the Clemson of the Big Ten
Penn State would be the Oregon State of the Big10. We really can only put it together once every 10 years, and even then we can’t make the Rose Bowl.
by Cairo on Sep 2, 2008 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hope to see a good game on Saturday...
isn’t College Football season the best?
PSU is feeling invincible after tarring and feathering our paid scrimmage opponent in game 1.
With the receivers OSU has, if your QB is accurate and quick it could be a huge day agains our suspect secondary. Our linebackers have to get their act together to help in coverage as well. Surprisingly our offense actually looks promising.
Come over to Black Shoe Diaries to for some good fan talk.
www.pinkertonpark.com
by rahpsu92 on Sep 3, 2008 7:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed, our secondary is swiss cheese
But if it rains like it is supposed to in Happy Valley, hopefully that won’t be much of an issue.
But if you guys can get the passing game going, it could be a long, long day for us.
Like rah said, come on over to Black Shoe DIaries. We always like to hear the other team’s perspective.
I bleed Blue and White.
by Horse N Buggy on Sep 4, 2008 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beware
Those of you saying Penn State is a Big Ten team and therefore they don’t have enough speed to cover a PAC-10 offense.
Florida State said they would run circles around us in the 2005 Orange Bowl. They lost.
Tennessee’s quarterback said Penn State’s defense was slow compared to defenses in the SEC. They lost.
The Big Ten is not all three yards and a cloud of dust offenses. Illinois and Indiana run spread offenses. Northwestern has been running a spread offense since the early 90’s. Michigan State routinely passed the ball 50-60 times a game under John L. Smith. Purdue is as pass happy as it gets. We’re used to seeing them for years. You would be wise not to judge the entire conference based on Michigan, Ohio State, and Wisconsin.
Should be a good game though. Our secondary isn’t the best, but Scirrotto is shifty and may get a pick or two. But I’m hoping our offense can control the ball and keep the defense off the field altogether.
Have fun.
Mike
Black Shoe Diaries
by BSD on Sep 4, 2008 9:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













