What the Hekker? Initial thoughts on OSU's 3-0 Sun Bowl victory
In what resembled a MLB game, or a bad hockey game, or a soccer game, or a 2nd grade youth basketball game, the Beavers beat Pittsburgh 3-0 in the 75th Brut Sun Bowl.
The last time Oregon State won 3-0 was against USC in 1967.
The Trojans came to town with O.J. Simpson, with everyone assuming that the Beavers would just be another featherweight in the path of USC claiming the national championship and going undefeated.
In that game, it all boiled down to a second-quarter field goal by Oregon State kicker Mike Haggard. Of his three attempts, a 30-yarder with 5:18 left before halftime was the only one he made.
In the 2008 Sun Bowl, Justin Kahut (now pronounced kay-HUT, by the way) made a field goal with 2:18 left in the first half.
The similarities between the two games are quite interesting.
"The whole game I didn't think that field goal would hold up," then-OSU coach Dee Andros said of the 1967 game in an interview with The Oregonian years later. "The conditions didn't bother O.J. a bit, and it was just a well-played defensive game by both teams."
Oregon State won the Sun Bowl due in a large part to their defense, which held LeSean McCoy to 78 yards on 24 carries in the game.
My schedule didn't allow for me to watch the game live, so I had to resort to watching the game off of my DVR several hours later. I will now spew out my thoughts stream-of-consciousness style, so I apologize in advance for poor grammar and anything that is unclear.
Offense: Coming into the game, we knew we would have to rely heavily on the passing game. Without Jacquizz being effective, the Beavers offense isn't the same. I had an inking that it could turn into a game where we throw the ball 50+ times, but after I watched Lyle throw his first pass of the game not even close to intended receiver Ryan McCants, I knew we were in for a long game.
I didn't think Lyle played particular well, but I know the wind was a large factor. There were a number of passes in which our receivers were wide open and had to make diving catches, negating yards after the catch, but Lyle has been doing that in almost every game this season.
We really needed our running backs to step up, and I thought they did fairly well. Nothing spectacular, but I don't think we expected a tremendous performance from either McCants or Francis. Like Lyle's incompletion that I was talking about above, another bad omen that came at the beginning of the game was McCants' fumble on his first carry. All in all, 99 yards between McCants and Francis isn't bad. This game was clearly a defensive battle, and Pitt's defense played well. That being said, Oregon State misfired a bunch-- twice, the Beavers took the ball inside Pitt's ten yard line and came away with no points.
Defense: The defense clearly won this game for us. Coming into the game, I thought that it would be very difficult to hold Pittsburgh to zero points. I seemed to think that Pitt would score several touchdowns even if we played great defense, and our offense would have to score to win the game. However, it worked the opposite way, and Oregon State won by keeping Pittsburgh out of the end zone.
Our defensive line was outstanding. Victor Butler, Slade Norris, and Stephen Paea all did a great job of leading the defense in dominating Pitt's offensive line all game. And when Pittsburgh did try to throw the ball, OSU's secondary stepped up. Pitt QB Bill Stull only completed (correction... 7) of 24 passes for 52 yards, and when he got hurt, backup QB Pat Bostick completed two passes for 37 yards. Both of Bostick's completions came on the final Pitt drive when the Panthers needed to get into field goal position to attempt a field goal to tie.
Thinking back on the game, I can only remember one time that Al Afalava was involved on a tackle. The box score indicates that he had one solo tackle and one assisted tackle, but I can only remember him tackling LeSean McCoy late in the game. Really, it seemed like our front seven just stuffed Pitt's rushing attack to the point that the secondary didn't have to make many tackles.
Special Teams: The game wouldn't have gone the same way it did without the performance of the defense, but our special teams were outstanding as well. For Hekker to punt the ball ten times and average 45 yards is phenomenal, especially considering where he was at the beginning of the season. And he was drilling kicks into the wind. Punting wasn't a liability today, it was an asset.
We can't end this conversation without talking about Kahut, who made the eventual game-winning kick in the second quarter. And also, kudos goes to Taylor Kavanaugh, who got the snap down after bobbling the football. Even if Kahut did kick the laces, it showed how disciplined the Perry-Kavanaugh-Kahut combination is.
Anything else I forgot? Chime in below.
GO BEAVERS!
(Sorry buthol, "What the Hekker" was too good to pass on.)
--Jake (jake.buildingthedam@gmail.com)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I was hoping they would make Hekker player of the game so bad.
"When Bellotti attempted to shake the hand of Oklahoma State quarterback Zac Robinson after the game, Robinson offered his left hand. His right was swollen and battered from the Ducks' defense."
by MarineCorpsDuck on Dec 31, 2008 9:00 PM PST reply actions
What The Hekker?
Give Hekker and the entire D the game ball. Losing half the O due to injuries really hurt. The low score had me on pins and needles the whole game. By the way Pitt QB was 7-24. Win’s a win!
congrats to the Beavs on a nice win.
12/19/08 - Thank you KLJ for coming into my life.
by norcaliangelsfan on Dec 31, 2008 11:18 PM PST reply actions
Already looking forward to the '09 season...
Overall, I thought the game was actually very entertaining. I know low scoring games can sometimes turn fans off but this one was a good game. Both defenses played at a high level and it was a competitive game throughout. With that being said though, I thought the Beavers were CLEARLY the better team. I know that the score may not indicate that but when you think that we got inside their 10 yard line twice and came away with zero points, and that half of our offense was standing on the sideline in street clothes then it becomes obvious who the better team was. Our defense absolutely dominated them from start to finish. The closest thing they got to scoring was a 58 yard field goal attempt. Thats pretty impressive when you think about it. And LeSean “Shady” McCoy or whatever he wants to call himself was absolutely a non factor in this game. I thought the CBS crew gave him WAY too much credit in comparing him to Dorsett so much when honestly there is no way he is better than Quizz. But I am still happy with the win for the Beavs as Coach Riley and staff did another wonderful job of getting these kids ready to play in a bowl game. Especially this year coming off of the awful loss to the Ducks with everything that was riding on that game.
Also two questions for the rest of Beaver nation. 1) Am I the only one who thought that the catch by Reese at the end of first half was CLEARLY a touchdown and that the refs simply blew that call? 2) Does it seem obvious that Ryan McCants future is either with a different team or at a different position for the Beavs? They honestly don’t seem to trust him running the ball that much and will probably want to put his athleticism on the defensive side of the ball at either DE or LB. Thoughts??
GO BEAVS!!!
Nice post
I think I was not “entertained” because it was so close and totally felt one TD by the Beavs would put it away for yes they were “CLEARLY” the better team. So it was very frustrating at times for me, BUT I was into it as much as other games (but I’m big time fan for one team!). It was a hard fought game and I think the conditions for both teams, in the first half especially, were a bit worse than even they were saying on the TV. I mean no one has mentioned that Sammie had a sure TD pass there and I had to think the wind caught that one too, Catchings (?) was as wide open as anyone got in the game! Man, that play was a GREAT call! The conditions makes it more impressive for the Beavs for we didn’t have our main running game available. And as you noted also on the other side shutting down the team with the supposedly better running game!
Interesting to note that Francis had 76 yards on 15 carries and McCoy had 85 yards on 24 carries. I think we need to give more props to Francis. I wouldn’t directly bash on McCoy too much for he showed some really good moves and power, and from what even Riley said before the game McCoy seems to be a class act. I think the hype was more about creating these stories for the broadcast to fill in for CBS obviously not being all that interested in either team, and fill in for when we weren’t watching six zillion commercials!
Yep, the CBS crew were pretty bad I thought, as mentioned above they had a couple “stories” researched by interns which they kept coming back to over and over again. They mentioned D. Fouts hating OSU, but I would have taken Fouts over them in a heart beat! At least he has some knowledge of OSU football!
Questions: 1 = Hell yes, I thought for sure it was going to be overturned. I guess it was not as clear as it was for us and the CBS crew! I think also that TD would have opened things up more for us in the second half on offense. But thought about it later and if they called it initially a TD and reviewed it I bet it would have been upheld as a TD too. I’m guessing in the end it was not “clear” enough to overturn the call on the field and wanted to respect the first on the field call, and maybe they didn’t have the same angle we saw on TV (?) for I know sometimes they don’t use the televised angles. But it was a TD, which is ironic because it was as much a TD as Newton’s TD catch at the end of the ’06 Sun Bowl which I think was also reviewed and upheld as a TD! I personally had no question.
2 = I think McCants is showing us that he is an inexperienced Freshman. The difference between him and Francis really showed this to me. Francis ran with patience and looked like an experienced back, McCants looked very shaky and unsure of where to go. Now for the game I totally understand going with Francis and don’t know if that means a total lack of trust or the immediate need for going with someone different. Plus giving it to the guy with the recent personal hardship is totally a Riley thing! Okay Riley melodrama aside, McCants’ future? I don’t know. I personally don’t think he would be happy with switching sides to become a converted LB. Also I know the Beavs do this but if I’m not mistaken the team doesn’t do this with someone they have so committed to a skilled position. So in answer to your question my personal feeling is that he is more likely to transfer, unless he can be patient and hold out with the Beavs. I think he should give it another year with the Beavs, for even if he hardly plays next year he will learn a lot going into another team if that is where he ultimately ends up.
p.s. Hey, VD I just read that Tedford got a two-year extension, does that change your views about Riley’s at all? I’m kind-of thinking if one gets it why not the other. Oh, how was the game?
-RVM
Glad to see Pitt shutout.
Way to suck it up and win ugly. Five bowl wins in a row is worth celebrating. But OSU did little to capture the imagination of college football fans around the country—lest punting becomes the new spread offense. It was another prat fall on the national stage. It’s no wonder your nemesis gets all the love. But congrats to the Beavs for another 9-win season, and upholding state and Pac-10 honor.
Oh, gee
I’m feeling bad about disappointing you so much, but I made a New Year’s resolution to not let my meaningless disappointments set me back this year.
So, Merry Belated Christmas: http://www.goducks.com/SportSelect.dbml?SPSID=3377&SPID=233&DB_OEM_ID=500&KEY=&Q_SEASON=2009
and here is their blog: http://www.addictedtoquack.com/
Enjoy your 2009!
-RVM
I thought maybe the post-CW shit talkers might be done, but I guess there’s one last wave.
"When Bellotti attempted to shake the hand of Oklahoma State quarterback Zac Robinson after the game, Robinson offered his left hand. His right was swollen and battered from the Ducks' defense."
by MarineCorpsDuck on Jan 1, 2009 5:28 PM PST up reply actions
Not disappointed
Watching the Beavers fail to impress is no skin off my nose. Actually, they did everything I hoped they would just by winning. And beating up a top 20 team in a bowl game is no prat fall. I made a misstatement. What I meant to convey was that OSU missed another opportunity to really shine. But the Beavs have much to feel good about. I mean that.
by Hank Hosfield on Jan 1, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions
Okay, yes have to admit it was the"prat fall" that got me a little worked up and well a bit of the reference to that other team (but I’ll give that latter one a bit of the grain of truth to you). I see what you are saying now and do totally agree about the missing the opportunity to shine. I think that is another reason it really stunk to not have either Rodgers playing for the opportunity was there for a healthy running attack to really shine in that game.
Not sure though about “another opportunity” for our bowl record has been excellent with Riley and some very memorable wins such as the ‘06 Sun Bowl. But if you are talking about this season all together there is some truth to that with the Penn State and Oregon games, but Utah was a hell of a game really against a BCS bowl team and the USC win was awesome and wasn’t the Cal game nationally televised (might have been regional, I can’t remember now but an excellent showing nevertheless)?
Anyway, thanks for the clarification!
-RVM
Only conference that will beundefeated in Bowls, I believe..
Great game for SC yesterday…if they’re not #2 at the end of the year, something’s wrong
President of the Tijuana Beaver Nation Boosters Club - "We don't need no stinkin' touchdowns!"
by sandiegobeav on Jan 2, 2009 10:46 AM PST up reply actions
It never ends with SC when they're playing in Reser
:-D
I support Takimoto in his effort to support Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.
by The VD Special on Jan 2, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions
Side note/question
Wasn’t that Riley’s first win over a Big East team?
I’m thinking yes but not sure and if so another break of a bad streak (like UCLA) and a new streak which will carry over to a nice W in the Cincy game next season!
-RVM
And Louisville the next season
I support Takimoto in his effort to support Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.
by The VD Special on Jan 2, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions
So that a yes on Riley’s first (and finally) versus Big East win?
-RVM
by rvm on Jan 2, 2009 1:41 PM PST up reply actions
I think so, off the top of my head
UConn, Louisville, Cincy, Rutgers, Syracuse, USF, West Virginia, we haven’t beaten (or played)
We just beat Pitt
Unless you wanna count Notre Dame as a Big East school which is essentially what they are!
I support Takimoto in his effort to support Roger Kieschnick in his quest to becoming the best Kieschnick ever to play professional baseball.
by The VD Special on Jan 2, 2009 2:12 PM PST up reply actions

by 


































