Nothin' but.... brick?

(I know, I know. Nobody wants to talk about basketball right now.)
If there's one thing that's guaranteed in the game of basketball, it's the logistics of a free throw. When a player goes to the line after being fouled, they're always going to be fifteen feet away from a ten foot basket, standing behind a twelve foot line.
Yet, why has it been so hard, historically, for Oregon State to make baskets under these circumstances?
"To win the big games you must get to the Free Throw line, and then you must make them."
--Rick Majerus, Saint Louis Head Coach
Over the last eleven years, the Beavers have only ranked under 100 nationally in free throw shooting three times. The Beavers shot 72.7% in 2000-2001, but things hit rock bottom when Oregon State shot 53.4% from the charity stripe two seasons ago. The Beavers have ranked over 225th nationally six times over the last eleven.
In last week's exhibition opener, Craig Robinson's team shot 51.7% from the line, missing a total of fourteen free throws. In the second exhibition against Concordia, the Beavers improved to 72.7% from the free throw line, leaving six points on the court.
Last year alone, the Beavers missed 236 foul shots over the course of 27 games
Now, granted, Oregon State hasn't assembled the greatest teams over this stretch. But a player doesn't need to be a superstar to make most of their free throws. Why can't we make them?
Whichever choice you vote for in the poll below, I would be interested to hear in the comments if you think Oregon State's free throw/shooting percentage will improve under Craig Robinson.
(image via Big Sky Shootout)
0 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
So tell me....
Are free throws coachable? Can Craig Robinson make a lot of the same guys from last year’s team make more free throws?
--JB--
by Jake Bertalotto on Nov 11, 2008 3:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely
Free throws are all about repetition. Coach Rob will make them do it again and again until they get it right!
by sangdorange on Nov 11, 2008 4:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not only is it all about repitition!
Coach John took good shooters and turned them into garbage. He somehow drained the entire teams confidence for years. We would have guys come in and actually get worse not better, that doesn’t make any sense other than terrible coaching for years.
by jaycb324011 on Nov 11, 2008 4:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No votes for crooked rims yet....
I thought that one would be popular.
--JB--
by Jake Bertalotto on Nov 11, 2008 5:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry Jake
If I had known how upset you’d be, I would have voted for crooked rims…
In all seriousness though, free throws are about 50% coaching, 50% player. Go to any middle school AAU game, and those kids can generally hit at least 75% of their free throws. At some point, they stop practicing them. My uncle, an avid basketball guy, once told me that free throws are like a golf swing. You need to do the same warm up as always, and constantly be swinging to maintain proper form. If a guy doesn’t practice free throws, he will lose the touch.
Oregon State: where play action defense and healthy QBs thrive
by The VD Special on Nov 11, 2008 6:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
My main point here is…. we need all the help we can get this year to win games. Free throws are just that- free shots. I mean, we’re talking about an 8 or 9 point swing in every game.
--JB--
by Jake Bertalotto on Nov 11, 2008 7:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Point of order...?
OK, here’s what we have so far: Some guys are better at the line than others, but as a whole the team makes more free throws when they practice them routinely. Therefore, based on the evidence before us, it makes sense that if a coach makes free throw practice a priority, more points will be scored from the free throw line. So I submit that poor performance at the free throw line is mainly an outcome of poor coaching. But wait, I hear you saying, there’s only so much time for practice and time spent on free throws means less time perfecting offensive schemes and so forth. To that I say, a guy struggling at the line willing to improve will spend extra hours in the gym on his own time because he has pride and doesn’t want to hurt the team. This mindset is also an outcome of good coaching. Back in the day, one good scowl from Ralph Miller was all it took.
But as usual, I’m open to alternative views.
by Joe A. on Nov 11, 2008 7:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Coaching and Talent
I agree with what VD said above. Free throw shooting is pretty much 50-50 as far as coaching and talent goes. However, it is alarming that the team as a whole has had that much trouble with shooting free throws. I mean there are usually at least 2-3 guys on every team that can consistently hit about 75% or more of their free throws. The low numbers suggests to me that the coaching staff has not put enough emphasis on it in practice in the past. I guess they figured that there were more pressing areas that the team needed to improve on. In my opinion though this was the exact opposite action I would have taken. I played basketball competitively all through middle school and high school, and whenever our team had a disadvantage in talent then the best way to play and stay competitive was to play good defense and hit your free throws. Doing those two things will help you from getting blown out and usually means you can steal some games also. It is a much better idea than to just try and jack up a bunch of 3’s and try to outscore a team that already has more talent than you do. I am sure defense and free throw shooting will be two areas emphasized by Coach Robinson and that is one reason why I expect this team to win 3-5 league games this year.
GO BEAVS!!!
by beavsfan10 on Nov 11, 2008 10:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Doing those two things will help you from getting blown out and usually means you can steal some games also
That’s exactly what we need to do.
--JB--
by Jake Bertalotto on Nov 12, 2008 5:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 













